4.7 Article

Label-free detection of human prostate-specific antigen (hPSA) using film bulk acoustic resonators (FBARs)

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
Volume 190, Issue -, Pages 946-953

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2013.09.064

Keywords

FBAR; Biosensors; Cancer diagnostics; Monoclonal antibody; Prostate-specific antigen; Protein adsorption

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/F062966/1, EP/F063865/1, EP/F06294X/1]
  2. Royal Society [RG120061]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61150110485]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F062966/1, EP/F06294X/1, EP/F063865/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Label-free detection of cancer biomarkers using low cost biosensors has promising applications in clinical diagnostics. In this work, ZnO-based thin film bulk acoustic wave resonators (FBARs) with resonant frequency of similar to 1.5 GHz and mass sensitivity of 0.015 mg/m(2) (1.5 ng/cm(2)) have been fabricated for their deployment as biosensors. Mouse monoclonal antibody, anti-human prostate-specific antigen (Anti-hPSA) has been used to bind human prostate-specific antigen (hPSA), a model cancer used in this study. Ellipsometry was used to characterize and optimise the antibody adsorption and antigen binding on gold surface. It was found that the best amount of antibody at the gold surface for effective antigen binding is around 1 mg/m(2), above or below which resulted in the reduced antigen binding due to either the limited binding sites (below 1 mg/m(2)) or increased steric effect (above 1 mg/m(2)). The FBAR data were in good agreement with the data obtained from ellipsometry. Antigen binding experiments using FBAR sensors demonstrated that FBARs have the capability to precisely detect antigen binding, thereby making FBARs an attractive low cost alternative to existing cancer diagnostic sensors. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available