4.7 Article

Ultrasensitive amperometric magnetoimmunosensor for human C-reactive protein quantification in serum

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
Volume 188, Issue -, Pages 212-220

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2013.07.026

Keywords

CRP; Amperometric magnetoimmunosensors; Magnetic beads; Human serum

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad Research Projects [CTQ2012-34238]
  2. AVANSENS Program from the Comunidad de Madrid [S2009PPQ-1642]
  3. EU [120215-CAJAL4]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation
  5. ENIAC Joint Undertaking
  6. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A highly sensitive magnetoimmunosensor for the determination of human C-reactive protein (CRP) is described in this work. A sandwich format involving covalent immobilization of the capture antibody (antiCRP) onto carboxylic-modified magnetic beads (HOOC-MBs) activated with N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N'-ethylcarbodiimide (EDC) and N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide (sulfo-NHS), the antigen-antibody reaction and incubation of the modified MBs with a biotynilated antibody (biotinantiCRP), is used. Furthermore, an incubation step with a Streptavidin HRP (Strp-HRP) conjugate is employed to allow monitoring of the affinity reaction. The resulting modified MBs are captured by a magnet placed under the surface of a disposable gold screen-printed electrode (Au/SPE) and the amperometric responses are measured at -0.10 V (vs. a Ag pseudo-reference electrode), upon addition of 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) as electron transfer mediator and H2O2 as the enzyme substrate. The CRP magnetoimmunosensor exhibited a wide range of linearity between 0.07 and 1000 ng mL(-1) with a low detection limit of (0.021 +/- 0.005) ng mL(-1). The magnetoimmunosensor was successfully applied to the analysis of an international standard for CRP serum. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available