4.6 Article

Evaluation of Prompted Annotation of Activity Data Recorded from a Smart Phone

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages 15861-15879

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s140915861

Keywords

activity recognition; ground truth acquisition; experience sampling; accelerometry; big data; mobile sensing; participatory sensing; opportunistic sensing

Funding

  1. EPSRC through the MATCH program [EP/F063822/1, EP/G012393/1]
  2. MSIP (Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning), Korea, under the ITRC (Information Technology Research Center) support program [NIPA-2013-(H0301-13-2001)]
  3. EPSRC [EP/F063822/1, EP/G012393/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G012393/1, EP/F063822/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Ministry of Public Safety & Security (MPSS), Republic of Korea [H0301-14-1003, H0301-13-2001] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper we discuss the design and evaluation of a mobile based tool to collect activity data on a large scale. The current approach, based on an existing activity recognition module, recognizes class transitions from a set of specific activities (for example walking and running) to the standing still activity. Once this transition is detected the system prompts the user to provide a label for their previous activity. This label, along with the raw sensor data, is then stored locally prior to being uploaded to cloud storage. The system was evaluated by ten users. Three evaluation protocols were used, including a structured, semi-structured and free living protocol. Results indicate that the mobile application could be used to allow the user to provide accurate ground truth labels for their activity data. Similarities of up to 100% where observed when comparing the user prompted labels and those from an observer during structured lab based experiments. Further work will examine data segmentation and personalization issues in order to refine the system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available