4.6 Review

Semaphorins in the development, homeostasis and disease of hormone systems

Journal

SEMINARS IN CELL & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 190-198

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2012.11.005

Keywords

Hormone; Gonadotropin-releasing hormone; Reproduction; Neuronal plasticity; Cell migration; Development

Funding

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche, ANR, France [ANR-2010-JCJC-1404-01, ANR-09-BLAN-0267]
  2. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale, Inserm, France [U837]
  3. University of Lille 2, Lille, France
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-09-BLAN-0267] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Semaphorin proteins are among the best-studied families of guidance cues. Initially characterized as repulsive neuronal guidance cues, during the last decade, significant progress has been made in defining their involvement in the regulation of dynamic changes in the cellular cytoskeleton during embryonic and postnatal neuronal development, under both physiological and pathological conditions. However, semaphorins are not restricted to the nervous system but widely expressed in other tissues, where they play key roles in angiogenesis and organogenesis. In recent years, there has been an increasing emphasis on the potential influence of semaphorins on the development and homeostasis of hormone systems, and conversely, how circulating reproductive hormones regulate semaphorin expression. In this review, we summarize recent studies analyzing the contribution of semaphorin signaling to the morphogenesis, differentiation and plasticity of fundamental neuroendocrine and endocrine systems that regulate key physiological processes, such as reproduction, bone formation and the control of energy homeostasis. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available