4.3 Article

Feeding stem-leaf-pod explants of pea (Pisum sativum L.) with D-chiro-inositol or D-pinitol modifies composition of α-D-galactosides in developing seeds

Journal

SEED SCIENCE RESEARCH
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 213-221

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S096025851000022X

Keywords

galactosyl cyclitols; D-chiro-inositol; pea; D-pinitol; raffinose oligosaccharides; seeds

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Scientific Research and Information Technology in Poland [N30312532/4015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Feeding stem-leaf-pod explants with D-chiro-inositol and D-pinitol was used as a method to modify alpha-D-galactosides in developing pea (Pisum sativum) seeds. Four genotypes differing in the composition of raffinose, stachyose and verbascose (raffinose family oligosaccharides or RFOs) in seeds - high RFOs (cv. Tiny), low RFOs (SZD175) and low verbascose (cv. Hubal and cv. Wt 506) - were studied. Although seeds of all examined pea lines were able to take up both D-chiro-inositol and D-pinitol, only D-chiro-inositol was effectively converted into its galactosides: mainly fagopyritol B1 (O-alpha-D-galactopyranosyl-(1 -> 2)- D-chiro-inositol) and fagopyritol B2 (O-alpha-D-galactopyranosyl-(1 -> 6)-O-alpha-D-galactopyranosyl-(1 -> 2)-D-chiro-inositol). In seeds of pea lines naturally containing low levels of verbascose (cv. Hubal) and low RFOs (SZD175), the enhanced accumulation of fagopyritols depressed the RFO level by c. 64 and 20%, respectively. Moreover, in both genotypes, about 25 and 30% of total galactose bound in a-D-galactosides occurred in fagopyritols. D-Pinitol present in the pea seeds was converted into monogalactosides, but their accumulation was several- fold lower than that of fagopyritols and did not significantly influence the accumulation of RFOs. Pea seeds with the composition of soluble carbohydrates modified by feeding with either of the cyclitols were able to complete germination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available