4.6 Article

Neoproterozoic tsunamiite: Upper Bhander Sandstone, Central India

Journal

SEDIMENTARY GEOLOGY
Volume 238, Issue 1-2, Pages 181-190

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2011.04.012

Keywords

Palaeotsunamiite; Run-up product; Draw-down product; Flow dynamics; Upper Bhander Sandstone; Intracratonic sag

Categories

Funding

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Govt. of India
  2. CAS
  3. National Research Foundation, South Africa
  4. University of Pretoria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper addresses a distinctive event bedset encased by coastal erg-margin deposits, at a preferred stratigraphic level near the base of the Neoproterozoic Upper Bhander Sandstone in central India. The bedset is composed of couplets of sandstone beds that exhibit incisive amalgamation although they differ in geometry, structures (at soles, within and at tops of beds), vertical grain-size variation as well as palaeocurrent pattern and direction. The wide extent of the bedset is evident from several exposures spread over a distance of more than 50 km roughly in strike-parallel direction. Flow and depositional dynamics interpreted from the coupled event beds are more consistent with a tsunami origin than alternative palaeogeography-compatible models of climate-induced storm, flash flood or accentuated tide deposits. A palaeotsunamiite model is thus discussed, with separate incoming and outgoing components. Considering the overall depositional setting to be an epeiric sea coast in an intracratonic sag basin, the relevant bedset is inferred to reflect the record of a teletsunamiite; it would also be one of the very few Precambrian tsunamiites known so far. Exceptional preservation of this possible tsunamiite was facilitated by sheltered deposition behind the backshore zone and the berm, as well as by rapid burial by wind-deflated sands and advancing aeolian dunes. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available