- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
How do you define and measure research productivity?
Authors
Keywords
Research productivity, FSS, Research evaluation, University rankings
Journal
SCIENTOMETRICS
Volume 101, Issue 2, Pages 1129-1144
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2014-03-18
DOI
10.1007/s11192-014-1269-8
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Measuring institutional research productivity for the life sciences: the importance of accounting for the order of authors in the byline
- (2013) Giovanni Abramo et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Individual research performance: A proposal for comparing apples to oranges
- (2013) Giovanni Abramo et al. Journal of Informetrics
- The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation
- (2012) Ludo Waltman et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- A Measure of Total Research Impact Independent of Time and Discipline
- (2012) Alberto Pepe et al. PLoS One
- What is the appropriate length of the publication period over which to assess research performance?
- (2012) Giovanni Abramo et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Revisiting the scaling of citations for research assessment
- (2012) Giovanni Abramo et al. Journal of Informetrics
- A sensitivity analysis of researchers’ productivity rankings to the time of citation observation
- (2012) Giovanni Abramo et al. Journal of Informetrics
- The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences
- (2012) Giovanni Abramo et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Research productivity: Are higher academic ranks more productive than lower ones?
- (2011) Giovanni Abramo et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor: Normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science
- (2010) Loet Leydesdorff et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- National research assessment exercises: a measure of the distortion of performance rankings when labor input is treated as uniform
- (2010) Giovanni Abramo et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (“Leiden”) evaluations of research performance
- (2010) Tobias Opthof et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Remaining problems with the “New Crown Indicator” (MNCS) of the CWTS
- (2010) Loet Leydesdorff et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations
- (2010) Ludo Waltman et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus
- (2009) Éric Archambault et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started