How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations
Published 2013 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations
Authors
Keywords
Bibliometrics, Publications, Productivity, Citations, Percentiles, Researchers
Journal
SCIENTOMETRICS
Volume 98, Issue 1, Pages 487-509
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2013-10-22
DOI
10.1007/s11192-013-1161-y
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Scientific peer review
- (2013) Lutz Bornmann ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics: The statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top-cited papers
- (2013) Lutz Bornmann JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- The research guarantors of scientific papers and the output counting: a promising new approach
- (2013) Félix Moya-Anegón et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The problem of citation impact assessments for recent publication years in institutional evaluations
- (2013) Lutz Bornmann Journal of Informetrics
- The Hirsch index and related impact measures
- (2012) Leo Egghe ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- INDICATORS FOR RESEARCH PERFORMANCE EVALUATION: AN OVERVIEW
- (2012) Saied Froghi et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- Two h-Index Benchmarks for Evaluating the Publication Performance of Medical Informatics Researchers
- (2012) Khaled El Emam et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Author name disambiguation: What difference does it make in author-based citation analysis?
- (2012) Andreas Strotmann et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation
- (2012) Ludo Waltman et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Where demographics meets scientometrics: towards a dynamic career analysis
- (2012) Lin Zhang et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation
- (2012) Jian Wang SCIENTOMETRICS
- Modesty-index
- (2012) Marek Kosmulski Journal of Informetrics
- Stata commands for importing bibliometric data and processing author address information
- (2012) Lutz Bornmann et al. Journal of Informetrics
- The new Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011
- (2012) Lutz Bornmann et al. Journal of Informetrics
- A better alternative to the h index
- (2012) Lutz Bornmann Journal of Informetrics
- The advantage of the use of samples in evaluative bibliometric studies
- (2012) Lutz Bornmann et al. Journal of Informetrics
- New Indices in Scholarship Assessment
- (2011) Dennis F. Thompson et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION
- The inconsistency of the h-index
- (2011) Ludo Waltman et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Biobibliometric profiling: An examination of multifaceted approaches to scholarship
- (2011) Cassidy R. Sugimoto et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents
- (2011) Loet Leydesdorff et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- A multilevel modelling approach to investigating the predictive validity of editorial decisions: do the editors of a high profile journal select manuscripts that are highly cited after publication?
- (2011) Lutz Bornmann et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY
- Quality Versus Quantity: Assessing Individual Research Performance
- (2011) J.-A. Sahel Science Translational Medicine
- Evaluating research: from informed peer review to bibliometrics
- (2011) Giovanni Abramo et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The research productivity of academic psychologists: assessment, trends, and best practice recommendations
- (2011) Ryan D. Duffy et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The success-index: an alternative approach to the h-index for evaluating an individual’s research output
- (2011) Fiorenzo Franceschini et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Nine Criteria for a Measure of Scientific Output
- (2011) Gabriel Kreiman et al. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
- Bibliometric data in clinical cardiology revisited. The case of 37 Dutch professors
- (2011) T. Opthof et al. Netherlands Heart Journal
- Assessing the varying level of impact measurement accuracy as a function of the citation window length
- (2011) Giovanni Abramo et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Successful papers: A new idea in evaluation of scientific output
- (2011) Marek Kosmulski Journal of Informetrics
- A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants
- (2011) Lutz Bornmann et al. Journal of Informetrics
- References made and citations received by scientific articles
- (2010) Pedro Albarrán et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Accuracy and completeness of publication and citation records in the Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar: A case study for the computation of h indices in Psychology
- (2010) Miguel A. García-Pérez JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Can the quality of scientific work be predicted using information on the author's track record?
- (2010) Rickard Danell JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments
- (2010) Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Metadata mega mess in Google Scholar
- (2010) Péter Jacsó ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
- The Usefulness of Peer Review for Selecting Manuscripts for Publication: A Utility Analysis Taking as an Example a High-Impact Journal
- (2010) Lutz Bornmann et al. PLoS One
- The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators
- (2009) David A. Pendlebury ARCHIVUM IMMUNOLOGIAE ET THERAPIAE EXPERIMENTALIS
- Testing the trade-off between productivity and quality in research activities
- (2009) Giovanni Abramo et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Assessing scientific research performance and impact with single indices
- (2009) John Panaretos et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields
- (2009) S. Alonso et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Towards objectivity in research evaluation using bibliometric indicators – A protocol for incorporating complexity
- (2008) Vroni Retzer et al. BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY
- The state of h index research. Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance?
- (2008) Lutz Bornmann et al. EMBO REPORTS
- Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than theh index? A comparison of nine different variants of theh index using data from biomedicine
- (2008) Lutz Bornmann et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- A quantitative analysis of indicators of scientific performance
- (2008) Sune Lehmann et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Convergent validity of bibliometric Google Scholar data in the field of chemistry—Citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or rejected but published elsewhere, using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Chemical Abstracts
- (2008) Lutz Bornmann et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Bibliometric statistical properties of the 100 largest European research universities: Prevalent scaling rules in the science system
- (2007) Anthony F.J. van Raan JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now