Analysis of bibliometric indicators for individual scholars in a large data set
Published 2013 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Analysis of bibliometric indicators for individual scholars in a large data set
Authors
Keywords
Statistical analysis, Citations, <em class=EmphasisTypeItalic >h</em>-Index
Journal
SCIENTOMETRICS
Volume 97, Issue 3, Pages 627-637
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2013-05-01
DOI
10.1007/s11192-013-1027-3
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The Hirsch index and related impact measures
- (2012) Leo Egghe ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- A Reverse Engineering Approach to the Suppression of Citation Biases Reveals Universal Properties of Citation Distributions
- (2012) Filippo Radicchi et al. PLoS One
- Persistence and uncertainty in the academic career
- (2012) A. M. Petersen et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Statistical Analysis of the Hirsch Index
- (2012) LUCA PRATELLI et al. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS
- Experimenting with the partnership ability φ-index on a million computer scientists
- (2012) Guillaume Cabanac SCIENTOMETRICS
- To cite or not to cite: author self-citations and the impact factor
- (2011) James Hartley SCIENTOMETRICS
- Statistical regularities in the rank-citation profile of scientists
- (2011) Alexander M. Petersen et al. Scientific Reports
- On the meaning of theh-index
- (2010) S Redner JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL MECHANICS-THEORY AND EXPERIMENT
- Big Macs and Eigenfactor scores: Don't let correlation coefficients fool you
- (2010) Jevin West et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Statistical validation of a global model for the distribution of the ultimate number of citations accrued by papers published in a scientific journal
- (2010) Michael J. Stringer et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Metadata mega mess in Google Scholar
- (2010) Péter Jacsó ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
- Methods for measuring the citations and productivity of scientists across time and discipline
- (2010) Alexander M. Petersen et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW E
- Quantitative and empirical demonstration of the Matthew effect in a study of career longevity
- (2010) A. M. Petersen et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists
- (2009) Filippo Radicchi et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW E
- Citation Statistics
- (2009) Robert Adler et al. STATISTICAL SCIENCE
- Modeling a century of citation distributions
- (2009) Matthew L. Wallace et al. Journal of Informetrics
- h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields
- (2009) S. Alonso et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Effectiveness of Journal Ranking Schemes as a Tool for Locating Information
- (2008) Michael J. Stringer et al. PLoS One
- Does the Committee Peer Review Select the Best Applicants for Funding? An Investigation of the Selection Process for Two European Molecular Biology Organization Programmes
- (2008) Lutz Bornmann et al. PLoS One
- Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact
- (2008) F. Radicchi et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure
- (2008) M. Rosvall et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Is g-index better than h-index? An exploratory study at the individual level
- (2008) Rodrigo Costas et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started