4.7 Article

Supersensitive detection and discrimination of enantiomers by dorsal olfactory receptors: evidence for hierarchical odour coding

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep14073

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japan [18300066, 22300066]
  2. Takasago International Corp.
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H01446, 22300066, 18300066, 15H02730, 15K14335] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Enantiomeric pairs of mirror-image molecular structures are difficult to resolve by instrumental analyses. The human olfactory system, however, discriminates (-)-wine lactone from its (+)-form rapidly within seconds. To gain insight into receptor coding of enantiomers, we compared behavioural detection and discrimination thresholds of wild-type mice with those of Delta D mice in which all dorsal olfactory receptors are genetically ablated. Surprisingly, wild-type mice displayed an exquisite supersensitivity to enantiomeric pairs of wine lactones and carvones. They were capable of supersensitive discrimination of enantiomers, consistent with their high detection sensitivity. In contrast, Delta D mice showed selective major loss of sensitivity to the (+)-enantiomers. The resulting 10(8)-fold differential sensitivity of Delta D mice to (-)-vs. (+)-wine lactone matched that observed in humans. This suggests that humans lack highly sensitive orthologous dorsal receptors for the (+)-enantiomer, similarly to Delta D mice. Moreover, Delta D mice showed >10(10)-fold reductions in enantiomer discrimination sensitivity compared to wild-type mice. Delta D mice detected one or both of the (-)- and (+)-enantiomers over a wide concentration range, but were unable to discriminate them. This enantiomer odour discrimination paradox indicates that the most sensitive dorsal receptors play a critical role in hierarchical odour coding for enantiomer identification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available