4.7 Article

Regulation of NDR1 activity by PLK1 ensures proper spindle orientation in mitosis

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/srep10449

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Chinese 973 Project [2012CB945002, 2014CB964800]
  2. Ministry of Education [20113402130010, PCSIRT IRT13038]
  3. Anhui Project [08040102005]
  4. Chinese Natural Science Foundation [91313303, 31271518, 314300054, 31320103904]
  5. National Institutes of Health [CA164133, DK56292]
  6. Central University [WK2340000032, WK2340000021]
  7. BBSRC [BB/I021248/1]
  8. Wellcome Trust [090090/Z/09/Z]
  9. BBSRC [BB/I021248/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I021248/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate chromosome segregation during mitosis requires the physical separation of sister chromatids which depends on correct position of mitotic spindle relative to membrane cortex. Although recent work has identified the role of PLK1 in spindle orientation, the mechanisms underlying PLK1 signaling in spindle positioning and orientation have not been fully illustrated. Here, we identified a conserved signaling axis in which NDR1 kinase activity is regulated by PLK1 in mitosis. PLK1 phosphorylates NDR1 at three putative threonine residues (T-7, T-183 and T-407) at mitotic entry, which elicits PLK1-dependent suppression of NDR1 activity and ensures correct spindle orientation in mitosis. Importantly, persistent expression of non-phosphorylatable NDR1 mutant perturbs spindle orientation. Mechanistically, PLK1-mediated phosphorylation protects the binding of Mob(1) to NDR1 and subsequent NDR1 activation. These findings define a conserved signaling axis that integrates dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interaction and spindle orientation control to genomic stability maintenance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available