4.7 Article

Bioreceptivity evaluation of cementitious materials designed to stimulate biological growth

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 481, Issue -, Pages 232-241

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.059

Keywords

Bioreceptivity; Ordinary Portland cement; Magnesium phosphate cement; Chlorella vulgatis

Funding

  1. Spanish Research Project [BIA2010-17478]
  2. postdoctoral Juan de la Cierva Programme of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness
  3. Industrial Research Funds of Ghent University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ordinary Portland cement (OPC), the most used binder in construction, presents some disadvantages in terms of pollution (CO2 emissions) and visual impact For this reason, green roofs and facades have gain considerable attention in the last decade as a way to integrate nature in cities. These systems, however, suffer from high initial and maintenance costs. An alternative strategy to obtain green facades is the direct natural colonisation of the cementitious construction materials constituting the wall, a phenomenon governed by the bioreceptivity of such material. This work aims at assessing the suitability of magnesium phosphate cement (MPC) materials to allow a rapid natural colonisation taking carbonated OPC samples as a reference material. For that, the aggregate size, the w/c ratio and the amount of cement paste of mortars made of both binders were modified. The assessment of the different bioreceptivities was conducted by means of an accelerated algal fouling test MPC samples exhibited a faster fouling compared to OPC samples, which could be mainly attributed to the lower pH of the MPC binder. In addition to the binder, the fouling rate was governed by the roughness and the porosity of the material. MPC mortar withmoderate porosity and roughness appears to be the most feasible material to be used for the development of green concrete walls. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available