4.7 Article

Evaluation of the particle measurement programme (PMP) protocol to remove the vehicles' exhaust aerosol volatile phase

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 408, Issue 21, Pages 5106-5116

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.07.010

Keywords

Tetracontane; Volatile removal efficiency; Nucleation mode; Accumulation mode; Layer thickness; Fractal dimension; Specific surface area; Euro 5/6 legislation

Funding

  1. Competence Center Energy and Mobility (CCEM-CH)
  2. US-NSF [0701013]
  3. Office Of The Director
  4. Office Of Internatl Science &Engineering [0701013] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

European regulation for Euro 5/6 light duty emissions introduced the measurement of non-volatile particles with diameter >23 nm. The volatile phase is removed by using a heated dilution stage (150 degrees C) and a heated tube (at 300-400 degrees C). We investigated experimentally the removal efficiency for volatile species of the specific protocol by conducting measurements with two Euro 3 diesel light duty vehicles, a Euro 2 moped, and a Euro III heavy duty vehicle with the system's heaters on and off. The particle number distributions were measured with a Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (SMPS) and a Fast Mobility Particle Sizer (FMPS). An Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS) was used to identify the non-refractory chemical composition of the particles. A Multi-Angle Absorption Photometer (MAAP) was used to measure the black carbon concentration. The results showed that the condensed material in the accumulation mode (defined here as particles in the diameter range of similar to 50-500 nm) was removed with an efficiency of 50-90%. The (volatile) nucleation mode was also completely evaporated or was decreased to sizes <23 nm; thus these particles wouldn't be counted from the particle counter, indicating the robustness of the protocol. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available