4.7 Article

Chronic toxicity of hydrogen peroxide to Daphnia magna in a continuous exposure, flow-through test system

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 392, Issue 2-3, Pages 225-232

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.12.015

Keywords

hydrogen peroxide; 35% Perox-Aid (R); Daphnia survival; Daphnia growth; continuous exposure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A flow-through, continuous exposure test system was developed to expose Daphnia magna to an unstable compound. 35% Perox-Aid(R) is a specially formulated hydrogen peroxide (a highly oxidative chemical) product approved for use in U.S. aquaculture and therefore has the potential to be released from aquaculture facilities and pose a risk to aquatic invertebrates. The study objective was to assess the effects of 35% Perox-Aid(R) on an aquatic invertebrate by evaluating the survival, growth, production, and gender ratio of progeny from a representative aquatic invertebrate continuously exposed to 35% Perox-Aid(R). The study design consisted of 6 treatment groups (10 test chambers each) with target hydrogen peroxide concentrations of 0.0, 0.32, 0.63, 1.25, 2.5, and 5.0 mg L-1. The study was initiated with <24-h-old Daphnia (1 daphnid per chamber) that were exposed to hydrogen peroxide for 21 days. Hydrogen peroxide concentrations <1.25 mg L-1 had no significant effect on Daphnia time to death compared to controls and no significant effect on the time to first brood production and the number of broods produced. Concentrations <0.63 mg L-1 had no significant effect on the total number of young produced. Concentrations >0.32 mg L-1 had a negative effect on Daphnia growth. Hydrogen peroxide had no significant effect on the gender ratio of young produced. All second generation Daphnia were female. A continuous discharge of hydrogen peroxide into aquatic ecosystems is not likely to affect cladocerans if the concentration is maintained at <0.63 mg L-1 for less than 21 days. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available