4.6 Article

Distribution of stable carbon isotope in coalbed methane from the east margin of Ordos Basin

Journal

SCIENCE CHINA-EARTH SCIENCES
Volume 57, Issue 8, Pages 1741-1748

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11430-014-4900-x

Keywords

coalbed methane; carbon isotope; origin; fractionation

Funding

  1. Major National Science and Technology Special Projects [2011ZX05062-01]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41272175]
  3. Ministry of Land and Resources of the People's Republic of China's [201311015-01]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2652013057]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The commercial recovery of methane from coal is well established in the coalbed methane (CBM) blocks at the east margin of Ordos Basin, China. CBM forms with various carbon isotopic ratios (delta C-13(PDB)) due to the carbon isotopic fractionation in biogenical or thermogenical processes. Based on the geologic evolution of coalbed reservoir and studies on the characteristics of delta C-13(PDB) values distributed spatially (e.g., horizontal CBM well location area, vertical coal burial zone, coal rank, etc.) and temporally (e.g., geologic evolution history), we explored the formation mechanism of carbon isotopic of methane. The relatively low delta C-13(PDB) values are widely distributed along the research area, indicating a trend of lighter-heavier-lighter from north to south. From a combination analysis of the relationship between delta C-13(PDB) and the relative effects, the essential aspects in determining CBM carbon isotope being light in the study area are: the genesis of secondary biogas in the north; water soluble effects in the active hydrodynamic areas in the middle; desorption fractionation effect promoted by tectonic evolution in the south; and the sudden warming hydrocarbon fractionation accelerated by magmatic event in particular areas (e.g., Linxian).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available