4.8 Article

Disproportionation of (Mg,Fe)SiO3 perovskite in Earth's deep lower mantle

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 344, Issue 6186, Pages 877-882

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1250274

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) grants [EAR-0911492, EAR-1119504, EAR-1141929, EAR-1345112]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy-National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE-NNSA) [DE-NA0001974]
  3. DOE-Basic Energy Sciences (BES) [DE-FG02-99ER45775]
  4. NSF
  5. EFree, an Energy Frontier Research Center - DOE-BES [DE-SC0001057]
  6. NSF-Earth Sciences [EAR-1128799]
  7. DOE-GeoSciences [DE-FG02-94ER14466]
  8. DOE-BES [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  9. Materials Research and Engineering Center program of the NSF [DMR-0819885]
  10. Directorate For Geosciences
  11. Division Of Earth Sciences [1345112, 1119504] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. Division Of Earth Sciences
  13. Directorate For Geosciences [1141929] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mineralogical constitution of the Earth's mantle dictates the geophysical and geochemical properties of this region. Previous models of a perovskite-dominant lower mantle have been built on the assumption that the entire lower mantle down to the top of the D layer contains ferromagnesian silicate [(Mg,Fe)SiO3] with nominally 10 mole percent Fe. On the basis of experiments in laser-heated diamond anvil cells, at pressures of 95 to 101 gigapascals and temperatures of 2200 to 2400 kelvin, we found that such perovskite is unstable; it loses its Fe and disproportionates to a nearly Fe-free MgSiO3 perovskite phase and an Fe-rich phase with a hexagonal structure. This observation has implications for enigmatic seismic features beyond similar to 2000 kilometers depth and suggests that the lower mantle may contain previously unidentified major phases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available