3.9 Article

Microbiology of the infected knee arthroplasty: Report from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register on 426 surgically revised cases

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 41, Issue 11-12, Pages 831-840

Publisher

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/00365540903186207

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR)
  2. Faculty of Medicine, Lund University
  3. Swedish Research Council-Medicine [09509]
  4. Stiftelsen for bistAnd At rorelsehindrade i Skane

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surgically revised deep infected primary knee arthroplasties reported to the Swedish knee arthroplasty register during the years 1986-2000 were studied with respect to microbiology, antimicrobial susceptibility pattern and changes over time. In early, delayed and late infections, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) were most prevalent (105/299, 35.1%), and twice as common as Staphylococcus aureus (55/299, 18.4%). In haematogenous infections, S. aureus was the dominating pathogen (67/99, 67.7%), followed by streptococci and Gram-negative bacteria. Methicillin resistance was found in 1/84 tested isolates of S. aureus and 62/100 tested isolates of CoNS. During the study period, methicillin resistance among CoNS increased (p = 0.002). Gentamicin resistance was found in 1/28 tested isolates of S. aureus and 19/29 tested CoNS isolates. A relative decrease in infections caused by S. aureus was observed, while enterococci increased. In empiric treatment of infected knee arthroplasty the type of infection should direct the choice of antibiotics. Awareness of the fact that most early infections are caused by CoNS can increase the chances of successful treatment with retained implant. Due to the high rate of gentamicin resistance among CoNS in infected knee arthroplasty, other antibiotics should be used in bone cement at revision.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available