4.3 Article

Risk factors for surgery and postoperative recurrence: analysis of a south China cohort with Crohn's disease

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 10, Pages 1181-1191

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2012.668931

Keywords

Crohn's disease; postoperative recurrence; risk factor; surgery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and aims. To investigate the risk factors for primary surgery and postoperative recurrence in a cohort of Chinese Crohn's disease (CD) patients. Methods. Medical notes of consecutive diagnosed patients from 2003 until 2010 were reviewed. Fifty-seven postoperative patients - finished regular follow-up - were recruited for postoperative recurrence analysis. Results. One hundred eleven of 323 (34.4%) patients of this cohort underwent primary surgery. The cumulative frequency of resection was 16.6%, 35.4%, 53%, and 94.5% for 1, 5, 10, and 30 years, respectively, after onset of disease. Male (OR: 1.994; 95% CI: 1.291-3.078, p = 0.002), stricture (OR: 4.832; 95% CI: 3.064-7.621, p = 0.000), or penetrating (OR: 4.923; 95% CI: 3.060-7.919, p = 0.000) were associated with an increased risk for primary surgery, while early use of immunomodulators was (OR: 0.438; 95% CI: 0.218-0.880, p = 0.020) associated with a decreased risk. Fifty-seven (21.1%) patients were diagnosed as postoperative clinical recurrence and the cumulative recurrence rates were 6.1%, 17.1%, and 36.8% for 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Perianal disease was associated with an increased risk for clinical recurrence (OR: 5.606; 95% CI: 1.59-19.766, p = 0.007). Conclusions. The operation frequency is high in CD. Male, penetrating, and stricture diseases are associated with an increased risk for primary surgery while early use of immunomodulators is associated with a decreased risk. The postoperative recurrence rate is also high. Patients with perianal disease are at higher risk for clinical recurrence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available