4.3 Review

Adjuvant imatinib for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: the current situation and problems

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages 645-651

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2011.551884

Keywords

Adjuvant; GISTs; imatinib

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To review the current situation and find out the current problems of adjuvant imatinib for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Methods. Searching for articles and records about imatinib for GISTs, especially adjuvant imatinib for GISTs, on MEDLINE, EMBASE and international conference on gastrointestinal. Results. GISTs are derived from mesenchymal cells of the gastrointestinal tract. The standard treatment for primary GISTs is to resect the tumor together with the negative margins completely without tumor rupture and spillage. Conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy is ineffective for advanced GISTs. The introduction of imatinib has dramatically changed the natural history of advanced GISTs. Imatinib is generally safe and effective with doses of 400, 600 or 800 mg daily, and has become the standard drug in the treatment for patients with advanced GISTs. Furthermore, most of the toxicity of imatinib is minimal and manageable, almost no treatment-related deaths have been reported. Therefore, adjuvant imatinib therapy is safe and seems to improve recurrence-free survival after the resection of primary GISTs. Conclusions. Although U.S Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency have approved the use of adjuvant imatinib for GISTs postoperatively, a series of questions about the use of adjuvant imatinib still exist, such as the impact of adjuvant imatinib on overall survival, the optimal dose, the best duration of treatment and the most suitable patients. Doctors and patients should weigh the pros (the decrease of relapse) and cons (drug toxicity and drug costs), especially in terms of the benefit of overall survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available