4.3 Article

Is dysplasia visible during surveillance colonoscopy in patients with ulcerative colitis?

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages 698-703

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00365520701866150

Keywords

colonoscopy; colorectal cancer; dysplasia; ulcerative colitis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) have an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer. It was widely believed that dysplastic lesions are invisible on colonoscopy and can only be detected by random biopsies, as 95% of dysplastic lesions occur in flat colonic mucosa indistinct from surrounding tissue. The aim of this study was to determine whether dysplasia is visible during routine surveillance colonoscopy by evaluating only patients who had dysplasia without overt carcinoma. Material and methods. The medical records, endoscopy and pathology databases were systematically reviewed between 1997 and 2004 at the University of Pennsylvania Health System. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease and dysplasia were identified and their medical charts reviewed. Results. Of the 113 patients with colonic dysplasia confirmed by pathology at our center, 102 (90%) had UC. Forty-nine of the 102 (48%) patients with UC underwent colonoscopic evaluation prior to dysplasia detection. This group was selected as our study cohort. Overall, 72 macroscopic abnormalities were detected at 49 colonoscopies, including 55 polypoid lesions, 12 areas of ulceration, 3 areas of nodularity, 1 irregular hemicircumferential lesion and 1 area of stricture. Overall, 58 dysplastic sites were detected; 51 were macroscopically visible (87.9%) and 7 were macroscopically invisible (12.1%). Conclusions. Most of the dysplasia in UC is endoscopically visible, but further prospective evaluation of a large number of patients is needed to validate the current observations. Our findings have the potential to modify current recommendations for surveillance biopsies in UC if validated by prospective studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available