4.1 Article

Lack of C4d deposition may reveal susceptibility for ascending aortic dissection

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL
Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages 177-182

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/14017431.2012.663502

Keywords

C4d; ascending aortic dissection; inflammation

Funding

  1. Competitive Research Foundation of Tampere University Hospital [9L058]
  2. Tuberculosis Foundation
  3. Finnish Heart Association
  4. Finnish Cultural Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. Complement activation as evidenced by C4d deposition indicates immunological tissue reactivity. We sought to study the vascular reactivity of the aortic wall by characterizing C4d deposits. Design. Aortic wall histology and immunohistochemistry for C4d, leukocytes, T-and B-lymphocytes, plasma cells, macrophages, endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, cell proliferation, elastase, and Van-Gieson-staining were performed to 91 consecutive patients that underwent surgery for ascending aorta, and the samples were grouped according to presence of C4d deposits. Results. Fifty-three out of 91 patients had C4d deposits mainly within the adventitia (C4d +), whereas 38 patients lacked C4d deposits (C4d-) including decreased staining of intra-aortic vessels (p < 0.005). Intimal thickness and cellularity, together with inflammation consisting of plasma cells were increased in C4d- as compared with C4d + (p < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis showed that C4d was associated with stabile nondissecting ascending aorta (AUC 0.792; SE 0.053; p = 0.000; 95% CI 0.688-0.895), but not with presence of aortitis per se (AUC 0.523; SE 0.069; p = 0.752; 95% CI 0.388-0.658). Conclusions. Lack of C4d may indicate active remodeling of the aortic wall leading to aortic dissection (AD). Immunologic complement factors may be amenable to diagnosis of instability after aortic surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available