4.7 Article

DEM Simulation of Direct Shear: 2. Grain Boundary and Mineral Grain Strength Component Influence on Shear Rupture

Journal

ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING
Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages 1673-1692

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-013-0494-4

Keywords

Intact brittle rock; Direct shear; Strength components; Rupture zone geometry; Distinct element method (DEM); Grain-based method (GBM)

Funding

  1. Centre for Excellence in Mining Innovation (CEMI)
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of mineral grain and grain boundary strength is investigated using a calibrated intact (non-jointed) brittle rock specimen subjected to direct shear with a particle-based distinct element method and its embedded grain-based method. The adopted numerical approach allows one to independently control the grain boundary and mineral grain strength. The investigation reveals that, in direct shear, the normal stress (sigma (n)) applied to a rock specimen relative to its uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) determines the resulting rupture mechanism, the ultimate rupture zone geometry, and thus its shear stress versus horizontal displacement response. This allows one to develop a rupture matrix based on this controlling parameter (i.e., sigma (n)/UCS). Mineral grain strength reductions result in the lowering of the apparent cohesion intercept of the peak linear Coulomb strength envelope, while grain boundary strength reductions change the peak linear Coulomb strength envelope to a bi-linear or curved shape. The impact of grain boundary strength is only relevant at sigma (n)/UCS ratios < 0.17 where tensile and dilatant rupture mechanisms dominate. Once shear rupture begins to be the dominant rupture mechanism in a brittle rock (i.e., at sigma (n)/UCS ratios > 0.17), the influence of weakened grain boundaries is minimized and strength is controlled by that of the mineral grains.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available