4.4 Article

Natural and artificial RNAs occupy the same restricted region of sequence space

Journal

RNA
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 280-289

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1261/rna.1923210

Keywords

SELEX; in vitro selection; nucleotide composition; self-organization

Funding

  1. NASA [NNX08AP60G]
  2. NIH [R01 GM 48080]
  3. NSF [DMS-0805950]
  4. NSERC of Canada
  5. SHARCNET
  6. Astronaut Foundation
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  8. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [0805950] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. NASA [NNX08AP60G, 96747] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Different chemical and mutational processes within genomes give rise to sequences with different compositions and perhaps different capacities for evolution. The evolution of functional RNAs may occur on a neutral network in which sequences with any given function can easily mutate to sequences with any other. This neutral network hypothesis is more likely if there is a particular region of composition that contains sequences that are functional in general, and if many different functions are possible within this preferred region of composition. We show that sequence preferences in active sites recovered by in vitro selection combine with biophysical folding rules to support the neutral network hypothesis. These simple active-site specifications and folding preferences obtained by artificial selection experiments recapture the previously observed purine bias and specific spread along the GC axis of naturally occurring aptamers and ribozymes isolated from organisms, although other types of RNAs, such as miRNA precursors and spliceosomal RNAs, that act primarily through complementarity to other amino acids do not share these preferences. These universal evolved sequence features are therefore intrinsic in RNA molecules that bind small-molecule targets or catalyze reactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available