4.7 Article

Occupation and epicondylitis: a population-based study

Journal

RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages 305-310

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker228

Keywords

lateral epicondylitis; medial epicondylitis; epidemiology; occupation; sickness absence

Categories

Funding

  1. Health and Safety Executive
  2. Arthritis Research Campaign (ARC) [PO552]
  3. MRC [MC_UP_A620_1018] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [U1475000001, MC_UP_A620_1018, MC_UP_A620_1014] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0508-10082] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To explore the relationship between occupational exposures and lateral and medial epicondylitis, and the effect of epicondylitis on sickness absence in a population sample of working-aged adults. Methods. This was a cross-sectional study of 9696 randomly selected adults aged 25-64 years involving a screening questionnaire and standardized physical examination. Age- and sex-specific prevalence rates of epicondylitis were estimated and associations with occupational risk factors explored. Results. Among 6038 respondents, 636 (11%) reported elbow pain in the last week. Of those surveyed, 0.7% were diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis and 0.6% with medial epicondylitis. Lateral epicondylitis was associated with manual work [odds ratio (OR) 4.0, 95% CI 1.9, 8.4]. In multivariate analyses, repetitive bending/straightening elbow > 1 h day was independently associated with lateral (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2, 5.5) and medial epicondylitis (OR 5.1, 95% CI 1.8, 14.3). Five per cent of adults with epicondylitis took sickness absence because of their elbow symptoms in the past 12 months (median 29 days). Conclusion. Repetitive exposure to bending/straightening the elbow was a significant risk factor for medial and lateral epicondylitis. Epicondylitis is associated with prolonged sickness absence in 5% of affected working-aged adults.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available