4.7 Article

How do pain and function vary with compartmental distribution and severity of radiographic knee osteoarthritis?

Journal

RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 11, Pages 1704-1707

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken339

Keywords

Knee osteoarthritis; Pain; Function; Clinical Assessment Study of the Knee; Radiographic severity; Population study

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council, UK [G9900220]
  2. North Staffordshire Primary Care Research Consortium for NHS
  3. Medical Research Council [G0501798] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [G0501798] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. In radiographic OA (ROA) of the knee, how does radiographic severity and pattern of compartmental involvement influence symptoms? Methods. Population-based study of 819 adults aged >= 50 yrs with knee pain. The severity of knee pain and function were measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities scale. Three radiographic views of the knees were obtained. Results. Seven hundred and seventy-seven participants were eligible (mean age 65.5 yrs, 357 males). Higher ROA severity in each of the tibiofemoral (TF) and patellofemoral (PF) compartments was independently associated with higher mean pain scores (TF: F-2,F- 700 = 9.0, P < 0.0001, PF: F-2,F- 700 = 12.7, P < 0.0001). The same pattern was found for mean function scores (TF: F-2,F- 705 = 7.1, P = 0.001, PF: F-2,F- 705 = 15.9, P < 0.0001). If either the TF or PF compartment was affected by moderate/severe OA, the added presence of OA in the other compartment did not increase the mean pain or function scores. Conclusions. It is the severity of radiographic disease within a compartment, rather than the distribution of radiographic disease between compartments that is associated with symptoms. ROA in the PF joint is associated with symptoms, emphasizing the importance of radiographic changes in his joint.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available