4.7 Article

Adjunctive anakinra in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate, or leflunomide, or cyclosporin-A monotherapy: a 48-week, comparative, prospective study

Journal

RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 9, Pages 1384-1388

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken223

Keywords

rheumatoid arthritis; anakinra; methotrexate; leflunomide; cyclosporin-A combination therapy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To assess the efficacy and safety of anakinra (ANK) as an add-on therapy in RA patients with inadequate response to monotherapy with non-biological DMARDs. Methods. A 48-week comparative, prospective study of patients with active RA [mean 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28): 6.81], despite MTX (n 48), or LEF (n=42), or CSA (n=38) treatment, in whom ANK (100 mg/daily SC) was given with corticosteroid cream topical application. Results. At 24 and 48 weeks the patient percentages meeting the ACR20 response criteria were 57 and 73%, respectively, 33 and 41% met ACR50, while 15 and 23% met ACR70. Significant improvements in number of swollen and tender joints, HAQ, pain, global disease assessment, CRP and haemoglobin from baseline to 24 and 48 weeks were evident. DAS28 decreased at 24 weeks (-1.68; 95% CI - 1.46, -1.90; P<0.0001), as well as at study end (-2.24; 95% CI -2.01, -2.47; P<0.0001). Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly weaker response in terms of pain and DAS28 in patients treated with concomitant CSA. The most common ANK-related adverse event was injection-site reaction (29%), being less frequent in male patients, as well as in patients treated with CSA. There were 17 withdrawals, 6 of them due to inefficacy. No opportunistic infections or new safety signals were observed. Conclusion. Considering the limitations of an open-label study, addition of ANK appears to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for many RA patients with inadequate responses to non-biologic DMARDs in clinical practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available