4.3 Article

A network meta-analysis of the efficacy and side effects of udca-based therapies for primary sclerosing cholangitis

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 6, Issue 29, Pages 26757-26769

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.5610

Keywords

primary sclerosing cholangitis; intervention; adverse events; clinical efficacy; network meta-analysis; Pathology Section

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81500665, 81370563]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LR14H030001]
  3. Ministry of Health of China-Major Medicine Science and Technology Project in Zhejiang province [WKJ2012-2-033]
  4. Scientific Research Foundation of Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, China [H20090014, Y20090269, Y20140696]
  5. Health Bureau of Zhejiang Province [2010KYB070]
  6. Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Zhejiang Province [Y201009942]
  7. Research Funds for Tian Qing Liver Diseases [TQGB20120057]
  8. Project of New Century 551 Talent Nurturing in Wenzhou and Zhejiang Provincial Program for the Cultivation of High-level Innovative Health talents

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Therapies for treatment of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) include administration of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) alone, or combination with metronidazole (MTZ) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), respectively. However, the optimum regimen still remains inconclusive. We aimed to compare interventions in terms of patient mortality or liver transplantation (MOLT), progression of liver histological stage (POLHS), serum bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels and adverse events (AE). Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials until 31, Jan 2015. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs), odds ratios (ORs) and mean difference (MD) between treatments on clinical outcomes. Sensitivity analyses based on the dose of UDCA, quality of trials or treatment duration were also performed. Results: Ten RCTs were included. Compared with UDCA plus MTZ, UDCA (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.01-3.41), UDCA plus MMF (HR 0.08, 95% CI 0.00-4.18), or OBS (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.01-3.98) all provided an increased risk of MOLT. UDCA provided a significant reduction in bilirubin and ALP levels compared with OBS (MD -13.92, P < 0.001; MD -484.34, P < 0.001; respectively). With respect to POLHS, although differing not significantly, UDCA plus MTZ had a tendency to improve LHS more than UDCA (OR 1.33), UDCA plus MMF (OR 3.24) or OBS (OR 1.08). Additionally, UDCA plus MTZ (MD -544.66, P < 0.001) showed a significant reduction in ALP levels compared with OBS, but appeared to be associated with more AEs compared with UDCA (OR 5.09), UDCA plus MMF (OR 4.80) or OBS (OR 7.21). Conclusions: MTZ plus UDCA was the most effective therapy in survival rates and liver histological progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available