4.3 Article

Gavage of D-Ribose induces Aβ-like deposits, Tau hyperphosphorylation as well as memory loss and anxiety-like behavior in mice

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 6, Issue 33, Pages 34128-34142

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.6021

Keywords

D-Ribose; memory impairment; Tau hyperphosphorylation; A beta-like deposition; anxiety-like behavior; Gerotarget

Funding

  1. 973-Projects [2012CB911004]
  2. Natural Scientific Foundation of China [NSFC 31270868, 31200601, CAS-20140909]
  3. Queensland-Chinese Academy of Sciences Biotechnology Fund [GJHZ1131, GJHZ201302]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In addition to D-Glucose, D-Ribose is also abnormally elevated in the urine of type 2 diabetic patients, establishing a positive correlation between the concentration of uric D-Ribose and the severity of diabetes. Intraperitoneal injection of D-Ribose causes memory loss and brain inflammation in mice. To simulate a chronic progression of age-related cognitive impairment, we orally administered D-Ribose by gavage at both a low and high dose to 8 week-old male C57BL/6J mice daily for a total of 6 months, followed by behavioral, histological and biochemical analysis. We found that long-term oral administration of D-Ribose impairs spatial learning and memory, accompanied by anxiety-like behavior. Tau was hyperphosphorylated at AT8, S396, S214 and T181 in the brain. A beta-like deposition was also found in the hippocampus for the high dose group. D-Glucose-gavaged mice did not show significant memory loss and anxiety-like behavior under the same experimental conditions. These results demonstrate that a long-term oral administration of D-Ribose not only induces memory loss with anxiety-like behavior, but also elevates A beta-like deposition and Tau hyperphosphorylation, presenting D-Ribose-gavaged mouse as a model for agerelated cognitive impairment and diabetic encephalopathy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available