4.3 Article

SIP1 is a downstream effector of GADD45G in senescence induction and growth inhibition of liver tumor cells

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 6, Issue 32, Pages 33636-33647

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.5602

Keywords

GADD45G; SIP1; cell senescence; hepatocellular carcinoma

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [81201542, 81301716, 81402348]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [12ZR1430100, 14YF1413900]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes [91-14-10, 91-13-04]
  4. Chinese National Key Project [2013ZX1000201-02]
  5. Key Discipline and Specialty Foundation of Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cellular senescence evasion caused by the inactivation of tumor suppressive programs is implicated in tumor initiation and therapeutic resistance. Our previous study has shown that the downregulation of growth arrest and DNA damage 45G (GADD45G) contributes to senescence bypass in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Here, we report that the Smad-interacting protein-1 (SIP1) is transcriptionally activated and functions critically in the GADD45G-induced tumor cell senescence. Knockdown of SIP1 significantly abrogates the suppressive effects of GADD45G on the growth of xenografted liver tumor in vivo. The essential role of SIP1 in GADD45G activities is further validated in the model of the proteasome inhibitor MG132-induced cell senescence. We further show that JNK but not p38 MAPK activation is involved in the GADD45G-mediated SIP1 upregulation, and that JNK inhibition counteracts the GADD45G-induced cellular senescence. More importantly, we show that GADD45G and SIP1 expression are coincidently downregulated in primary human HCC tissues. Together, our results establish that the dowregulation of GADD45G-SIP1 axis may contribute to cellular senescence evasion and HCC development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available