3.9 Article

Genetic diversity and conservation of Mammillaria huitzilopochtli and M-supertexta, two threatened species endemic of the semiarid region of central Mexico

Journal

REVISTA MEXICANA DE BIODIVERSIDAD
Volume 85, Issue 2, Pages 565-575

Publisher

INST BIOLOGIA, UNIV NACIONAL AUTONOMA MEXICO
DOI: 10.7550/rmb.39066

Keywords

endemic species; genetic groups; Mammillaria; Tehuacan-Cuicatlan valley

Funding

  1. PAPIIT-DGAPA, UNAM [IN217208]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nearly 168 species of Mammillaria are endangered at the global level; most of these cactus species exhibit a narrow distribution range and/or small population size. Recently, the first population genetics studies showed low to moderate levels of heterozygosity in this genus. This study examines Mammillaria huitzilopochtli and M. supertexta, 2 threatened species endemic to the central semiarid region of Mexico, to propose conservation actions, as well as to identify the underlying processes that determine the levels of population genetic diversity in these species. A total of 106 and 148 individuals from 5 populations were sampled for M. huitzilopochtli and M. supertexta, respectively. Each individual was genotyped at 8 microsatellite loci. The levels of heterozygosity were high in the 2 species, but differences in allelic richness were detected. Genetic differentiation between populations was significant in both species, with evidence for isolation by distance in M. supertexta but not in M. huitzilopochtli. We postulated that genetic drift; geographic isolation and inbreeding are the most important processes shaping the populations' genetic variability and differentiation. We identified 3 and 4 genetic groups for M. huitzilopochtli and M. supertexta, respectively. In the Tehuacan-Cuicatlan valley these groups may be used as references to guide plant conservation efforts under ecosystem-based approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available