4.3 Article

Galectin-1 is overexpressed in CD133+ human lung adenocarcinoma cells and promotes their growth and invasiveness

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages 3111-3122

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.3076

Keywords

galectin-1; CD133; lung adenocarcinoma; Cancer Stem Cells

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81101775]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous studies demonstrated that a subpopulation of cancer cells, which are CD133 positive (CD133(+)) feature higher invasive and metastatic abilities, are called cancer stem cells (CSCs). By using tumor cells derived from patients with lung adenocarcinoma, we found that galectin-1 is highly overexpressed in the CD133(+) cancer cells as compared to the normal cancer cells (CD133(-)) from the same patients. We overexpressed galectin-1 in CD133(-) cancer cells and downregulated it in CSCs. We found that overexpression of galectin-1 promoted invasiveness of CD133(-) cells, while knockdown of galectin-1 suppressed proliferation, colony formation and invasiveness of CSCs. Furthermore, tumor growth was significantly inhibited in CSCs xenografts with knockdown of galectin-1 as compared to CSCs treated with scramble siRNAs. Biochemical studies revealed that galectin-1 knockdown led to the suppression of COX-2/ PGE2 and AKT/ mTOR pathways, indicating galectin-1 might control the phenotypes of CSCs by regulating these signaling pathways. Finally, a retrospective study revealed that galectin-1 levels in blood circulation negatively correlates with overall survival and positively correlates with lymph node metastasis of the patients. Taken together, these findings suggested that galectin-1 plays a major role on the tumorigenesis and invasiveness of CD133(+) cancer cells and might serve as a potential therapeutic target for treatment of human patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available