4.0 Article

Oviposition of Aedes aegypti Linnaeus, 1762 and Aedes albopictus Skuse, 1894 (Diptera: Culicidae) under laboratory and field conditions using ovitraps associated to different control agents, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil

Journal

REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENTOMOLOGIA
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages 304-310

Publisher

SOC BRASILEIRA ENTOMOLOGIA
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbe.2018.08.001

Keywords

Chikungunya; Control; Dengue; Insecticides; Zika

Categories

Funding

  1. Laboratory of Biological Control and Biotechnology of Malaria and Dengue of the National Institute of Research of the Amazon
  2. Foundation for Research Support of the State of Amazonas
  3. National Council for the Scientific and Technological Development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of different control agents of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus associated with ovitraps under laboratory and field conditions. Five treatments were used: grass infusion +Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis (gI + Bti), grass infusion +Saccharopolyspora spinosa (gI + Ss), grass infusion + Pyriproxyfen (gI + P), distilled water + Toxorhynchites haemorrhoidalis (dW + Th), and grass infusion (gI) (control). The highest mean number of eggs of both species were obtained with grass infusion in the laboratory. Among control agents, the lowest mean of A. aegypti eggs occurred with gI + Ss and the lowest mean of A. albopictus eggs occurred with dW + Th. There was no difference between treatments in A. aegypti (P= 0.4320) and A. albopictus (P= 0.7179). In the field, the highest mean number of eggs for both species were obtained with gI + Ss, and the lowest values were obtained with gI + P (P= 0.0124). The treatments can be applied to both the surveillance and the control, but ovitraps with biological larvicide Bti were more effective and safer considering the number of eggs laid and selectivity of pathogens for mosquitoes. (C) 2018 Sociedade Brasileira de Entomologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available