3.9 Article Proceedings Paper

Marine stock enhancement in Florida: A multi-disciplinary, stakeholder-supported, accountability-based approach

Journal

REVIEWS IN FISHERIES SCIENCE
Volume 16, Issue 1-3, Pages 51-57

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10641260701776902

Keywords

adaptive management; genetic identification; red drum; Sciaenops ocellatus

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Saltwater fishery management in Florida, USA, is mandated to include user-supported hatchery-based stock enhancement. Scientists at the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and Mote Marine Laboratory have taken a multi-disciplinary, quantitative approach to develop effective strategies for integrating stocking into traditional fishery management, with an initial focus on red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus). With consensus from stakeholders, particularly from a well-informed advisory board, focus has shifted over the past 8 years from production-oriented stocking to an assessment-driven developmental approach. The goal is to develop and expand economically successful and ecologically sound stocking technology for rapidly replenishing depleted fish stocks in a multi-billion dollar (US) saltwater recreational fishing industry. Release-recapture experiments for red drum have been underway in Tampa Bay for 6 years. This research has involved replicate stratified releases of 4 million red drum hatchlings, which are identifiable via genetic testing. More than 20,000 red drum tissues have been tested. These were obtained from fishery-independent and dependent sampling and from an angler-return program,. Of these, approximately 3,000 specimens have been assigned to hatchery breeding pairs. Experimental results, especially those based on hatchery fish recruited to the recreational fishery, have provided managers with valuable information about size at release, release timing, release habitat, and post-release movement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available