4.6 Article

Effect of Heat Treatment Process on Microstructure and Fatigue Behavior of a Nickel-Base Superalloy

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 8, Issue 9, Pages 6179-6194

Publisher

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/ma8095299

Keywords

heat treatment; microstructure; fatigue behavior; fatigue life model; fracture mechanism

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51575129, 51505101]
  2. Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program [J15LA51]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M571407]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study of fatigue behaviors for nickel-base superalloys is very significant because fatigue damage results in serious consequences. In this paper, two kinds of heat treatment procedures (Pro.I and Pro.II) were taken to investigate the effect of heat treatment on microstructures and fatigue behaviors of a nickel-base superalloy. Fatigue behaviors were studied through total strain controlled mode at 650 degrees C. Manson-Coffin relationship and three-parameter power function were used to predict fatigue life. A good link between the cyclic/fatigue behavior and microscopic studies was established. The cyclic deformation mechanism and fatigue mechanism were discussed. The results show that the fatigue resistance significantly drops with the increase of total strain amplitudes. Manson-Coffin relationship can well predict the fatigue life for total strain amplitude from 0.5% to 0.8%. The fatigue resistance is related with heat treatment procedures. The fatigue resistance performance of Pro.I is better than that of Pro.II. The cyclic stress response behaviors are closely related to the changes of the strain amplitudes. The peak stress of the alloy gradually increases with the increase of total strain amplitudes. The main fracture mechanism is inhomogeneous deformation and the different interactions between dislocations and gamma' precipitates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available