4.6 Article

Process Optimisation to Control the Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Biomimetic Nanoscale Hydroxyapatites Prepared Using Wet Chemical Precipitation

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages 2297-2310

Publisher

MDPI AG
DOI: 10.3390/ma8052297

Keywords

bioceramics; hydroxyapatite; nanoparticles; processing; wet-precipitation

Funding

  1. UK EPSRC Centre for Innovative Manufacturing of Medical Devices-MeDe Innovation (EPSRC) [EP/K029592/1]
  2. [FP7-PEOPLE-2011-IEF-302315-NBC-ReGen4]
  3. EPSRC [EP/K029592/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K029592/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydroxyapatite nanoscale particles (nHA) were prepared by wet chemical precipitation using four different synthesis methods. Differences in physico-chemical properties including morphology, particle-size, and crystallinity were investigated following alteration of critical processing parameters. The nanoparticles were also studied using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy in attenuated total reflectance mode (FTIR-ATR), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) with energy dispersive X-ray (EDS) spectrometry. The results showed that the particles obtained were composed of nHA, with different morphologies and aspect ratios (1.5 to 4) and degrees of crystallinity (40% to 70% following calcination) depending on the different process parameters of the synthesis method used, such as temperature, ripening time and pH. This study demonstrated that relatively small adjustments to processing conditions of different wet chemical preparation methods significantly affect the morphological and chemical characteristics of nHA. For the predicable preparation of biomimetic nHA for specific applications, the selection of both production method and careful control of processing conditions are paramount.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available