4.3 Article

Key to mangrove pollen and spores of southern China: an aid to palynological interpretation of Quaternary deposits in the South China Sea

Journal

REVIEW OF PALAEOBOTANY AND PALYNOLOGY
Volume 176, Issue -, Pages 41-67

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2012.03.004

Keywords

mangrove; pollen morphology; Quaternary; marine deposits; South China Sea

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [40971029, 40771072, 41076034]
  2. National Basic Research Program (973 Program) [2010CB951203]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences Visiting Professorship for Senior International Scientists
  4. CAS Innovation-Programme [KZCX2-YW-QN112]
  5. NSFC [41172011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Illustrations of, and keys to, mangrove pollen and spores from extant taxa are essential to studies of tropical Quaternary palynology and palaeoecology of estuarine and marine deposits. In this paper we present a pollen morphological atlas and identification keys for most of the mangrove flora of the coastal areas of south China, including an interspecific key to the major mangrove elements Rhizophora and Sonneratia. The morphology of the pollen and spores of 38 species of living mangrove and associated plants is described and illustrated by transmitted light photographs and scanning electron micrographs. These descriptions and illustrations, and the identification keys are presented at an achievable taxonomic level. The keys are open for future development so that pollen of other mangrove and associated plants can be accommodated when available. In their present state they should, nevertheless, aid palynological analyses of Quaternary mangrove and associated estuarine and marine deposits, particularly in the South China Sea and surrounding regions, but also elsewhere in tropical and subtropical regions. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available