4.4 Article

INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB (AVASTIN) PREVENTION OF PANRETINAL PHOTOCOAGULATION-INDUCED COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE PROLIFERATIVE DIABETIC RETINOPATHY

Journal

RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES
Volume 28, Issue 9, Pages 1319-1324

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31818356fb

Keywords

diabetes; intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin); clinically significant diabetic macular edema (CSDME); panretinal photocoagulation (PRP); proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR); vascular endothelial growth factor

Categories

Funding

  1. Research to Prevent Blindness, New York, NY

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (Avastin) (IVA) in preventing panretinal photocoagulation (PRP)-induced macular thickening and visual dysfunction in eyes with severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Methods: A retrospective review of 60 consecutive eyes (30 patients) with severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy whose visual acuity was 20/30 or better (<0.18 in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution acuity) and average foveal thickness (FT) was 280 mu m or less, and whose retinopathy was bilateral and symmetrical, was performed. In all eyes, PRP was performed in two sessions. In the interventional group, 1.25 mg of IVA was injected to each eye 1 week before initiation of PRP. Foveal thickness was measured by optical coherence tomography before treatment, and the clinical course was monitored by best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and FT for 24 weeks after beginning PRP. Results: Before treatment, mean BCVA and FT was 0.073 +/- 0.071 mu m and 278.8 +/- 29.5 mu m in the IVA-injected group and 0.069 +/- 0.076 mu m and 273.5 +/- 27.7 mu m in the control group, respectively. After the IVA injection and PRP completion, FT in the IVA-injected eyes was significantly decreased, with a mean FT of 257.2 mu m at 12 weeks and 264.3 mu m at 24 weeks. In the control group, FT increased dramatically and reached 307.3 mu m at 12 weeks and 298.2 mu m at 24 weeks. The difference in final FT between groups was significant (P = 0.001). Best corrected visual acuity in the control group decreased with time to 0.149 +/- 0.113 at 24 weeks; in contrast, BCVA in the IVA-injected eyes improved over time to 0.039 +/- 0.054 at 24 weeks. This difference in BCVA was statistically significant (P <= 0.0001). Seven eyes (23.3%) in the control group had worse vision by >= 2 lines and increased FT by >= 50 mu m at 24 weeks, whereas none of the eyes in the IVA group had either worse vision or a significant increase in FT (P = 0.011). Conclusions: A single IVA injection given before standard PRP may be beneficial in preventing PRP-induced visual dysfunction and foveal thickening in eyes with severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy and good vision. RETINA 28:1319-1324, 2008

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available