4.4 Article

Monitoring the social benefits of ecological restoration

Journal

RESTORATION ECOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages 1045-1050

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/rec.12888

Keywords

ecosystem services; flood modeling; indicators; recreation; value

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ecological restoration has traditionally been evaluated by monitoring the recovery of ecological conditions, such as species abundance and diversity, physical form, and water quality; monitoring the social benefits of restoration is uncommon. Current monitoring frameworks do not track who benefits from restoration or by how much. We investigate how ecological restoration could be monitored to provide indications of improvement in terms of social conditions. We provide suggestions for measuring several categories of social indicators, including access, beneficiaries, and quality of benefit, using information compiled from natural and social science literature. We demonstrate how to evaluate ecological and social indicators over time at a site or landscape scale using multicriteria analysis. We use flood protection and recreation as example benefits to monitor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Ecology

Ecological restoration should be redefined for the twenty-first century

David M. Martin

RESTORATION ECOLOGY (2017)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Developing qualitative ecosystem service relationships with the Driver Pressure-State-Impact-Response framework: A case study on Cape Cod, Massachusetts

David M. Martin, Amy N. Piscopo, Marnita M. Chintala, Timothy R. Gleason, Walter Berry

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS (2018)

Article Environmental Sciences

Combining ecosystem services assessment with structured decision making to support ecological restoration planning

David M. Martin, Marisa Mazzotta, Justin Bousquin

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (2018)

Article Engineering, Environmental

Structured Decision Making to Meet a National Water Quality Mandate

David M. Martin, Amy N. Piscopo, Marnita M. Chintala, Timothy R. Gleason, Walter Berry

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION (2019)

Article Environmental Sciences

A Multiarmed Bandit Approach to Adaptive Water Quality Management

David M. Martin, Fred A. Johnson

INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT (2020)

Article Environmental Sciences

Using Decision Analysis to Integrate Habitat and Community Values for Coastal Resilience Planning

David M. Martin, Jackie A. Specht, Michelle R. Canick, Kelly L. Leo, Kathleen Freeman

Summary: Decision analysis was used in habitat and community resilience planning in Maryland, USA, focusing on identifying high-value conservation planning units in the Lower Eastern Shore. Through sensitivity analysis and the Pareto efficiency principle, tradeoffs between habitat protection and community engagement were revealed, with four Pareto efficient units identified in the study.

ESTUARIES AND COASTS (2022)

Article Environmental Sciences

Using Structured Decision Making to Evaluate Wetland Restoration Opportunities in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

David M. Martin, Amy D. Jacobs, Chase McLean, Michelle R. Canick, Kathleen Boomer

Summary: Wetland restoration is crucial for water quality and climate resilience. However, the lack of consideration for tradeoffs at large scales limits decision-making capacity. This study demonstrates the use of structured decision making (SDM) to evaluate various restoration options and provides guidance for large-scale restoration decisions.

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (2022)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Creating conservation strategies with value-focused thinking

David M. Martin, Joshua G. Goldstein, David R. Smith, Jessica Musengezi, Jessie G. Rountree, G. A. Pabodha Galgamuwa, Aileen Craig, Michelle Dietz, Caitlin Kerr

Summary: Biodiversity and human well-being strategies depend on people's thinking. We tested the value-focused thinking (VFT) framework with conservation planning teams and found that it resulted in high-quality strategies and participant satisfaction. Our materials related to VFT were scalable and could be used by newly trained facilitators. Participants with previous conservation planning experience were equally or more satisfied with their VFT strategies compared to previous strategies. Our results highlight the advantages of using VFT in the development and evaluation of conservation planning frameworks.

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY (2023)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Prioritizing restoration sites that improve connectivity in the Appalachian landscape, USA

Melissa Clark, Kimberly R. Hall, David M. Martin, Braven Beaty, Stephen Lloyd, G. A. Pabodha Galgamuwa, Rebecca Shirer, Christopher L. Zimmerman, Kathryn M. Shallows

Summary: Restoring landscape connectivity is crucial for preserving biodiversity and ecosystem services. This study developed a decision-focused process for prioritizing restoration sites in the Appalachian Mountains, USA, by incorporating connectivity enhancement. The methods were developed collaboratively by scientists and local decision-makers, highlighting the importance of area-specific decisions.

CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE (2023)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Navigating inconsistent preferences: A multimethod approach to making informed decisions

David M. Martin

Summary: This study introduces a decision-analytic framework for prioritizing conservation strategies by combining direct and indirect preference-elicitation methods and analyzing inconsistencies between them. Results indicate that understanding potential bias in the direct method and clarifying assumptions in the indirect method can reduce inconsistencies, providing useful insights for decision-making.

CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE (2021)

No Data Available