4.4 Article

Market Perceptions and Opportunities for Native Plant Production on the Southern Colorado Plateau

Journal

RESTORATION ECOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue -, Pages 113-124

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00656.x

Keywords

local genotype; market perception differences; native plant market; native plant policy; web-based survey

Categories

Funding

  1. Northern Arizona University's Environmental, Research, Development, and Education for the New Economy (ERDENE) Initiative
  2. Ecological Monitoring & Assessment Program Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increases in revegetation activities have created a large demand for locally adapted native plant materials (NPM) in the southwestern United States. Currently, there is a minimal supply of local genotypes to meet this demand. We investigated the potential for the initiation of a native plant market in the southern Colorado Plateau. Through a literature search, interviews, and site visits, we identified existing native plant markets outside of the region as useful models to help initiate a regional market. We used web-based surveys to identify and analyze current and future NPM needs and concerns. Survey results indicate that management policy strongly drives decisions regarding the use and purchase of NPM. From a demand perspective , lack of availability and cost of NPM has kept purchasing minimal, despite policy changes favoring the use of natives. For suppliers, further development of NPM is limited by inconsistent and unreliable demand and lack of production knowledge. The knowledge and tools necessary to initiate an NPM market are available, but inadequate funding sources and insufficient information sharing hinder its development. Communication among producers, land managers, buyers, and researchers, as well as partnerships with local growers, appear to be vital to initiating a functional market.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available