4.2 Article

Risk factors for airway hyperresponsiveness in severely obese women

Journal

RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY & NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 186, Issue 2, Pages 137-145

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2013.01.009

Keywords

Hyperresponsiveness; Obesity; Asthma

Funding

  1. Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris (AP-HP: Direction de la Recherche Clinique et du Developpement: Contrat d'Initiation a la Recherche Clinique) [P061010]
  2. Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris [P061010]
  3. Centre d'Investigations Cliniques
  4. Direction de la Recherche Clinique et du Developpement (DRCD of AP-HP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Obesity affects airway diameter and tidal ventilation pattern, which could perturb smooth muscle function. The objective was to assess the pathophysiology of airway hyperresponsiveness in obesity while controlling for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Obese women (n=118, mean +/- SD BMI 46.1 +/- 6.8 kg/m(-2)) underwent pulmonary function testing (including tidal ventilation monitoring and methacholine challenge) and oesogastro-duodenal fibroscopy. Fifty-seven women (48%, 95% CI: 39-57%) exhibited hyperresponsiveness (dose-response slope >= 2.39% decrease/mu mol) that was independently and positively correlated with predicted % FRC, Raw(0.5) and negatively correlated with sigh frequency during tidal ventilation. Obese women had an increased breathing frequency but a similar sigh frequency than healthy lean women (n = 30). Twenty-two obese women (19%, 95% CI: 12-26%) were classified as asthmatics (hyperresponsiveness and suggestive symptoms) without confounding effect of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. In conclusion, in women referred for bariatric surgery, unloading of bronchial smooth muscle (reduced airway calibre and sigh frequency) is associated with hyperresponsiveness. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available