4.5 Article

Resting and ADL-induced dynamic hyperinflation explain physical inactivity in COPD better than FEV1

Journal

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
Volume 107, Issue 6, Pages 834-840

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.02.017

Keywords

COPD; ADL; Dynamic hyperinflation; Physical activity

Funding

  1. Lung Foundation Netherlands [3.4.08.040]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Physical activity and health status deteriorate early in the course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This can only partially be explained by the degree of airflow limitation. Changes in (resting and dynamic) lung volumes are known to be associated with functional impairments and thus might influence physical activity level. The aim of the present cross-sectional study was to explore the contribution of dynamic hyperinflation during daily life activities (ADL) in the decline in physical activity. Methods: Airflow limitation and inspiratory capacity at rest to total lung capacity ratio (IC/TLC) as a measure of resting hyperinflation were measured in 59 patients with COPD (GOLD I-IV). Mean daily physical activity was assessed with a tri-axial accelerometer. Measurements of dynamic hyperinflation during ADL (Delta IC and inspiratory reserve volume at end ADL) were performed at patients' home using a portable breath-by-breath system. Results: Multiple regression analysis showed that resting as well as ADL-induced dynamic hyperinflation independently contributed to decreased daily physical activity, together explaining 45.8% of the variance in physical activity. In contrast to hyperinflation, the severity of airflow limitation (FEV1) appeared to have no unique part in explaining how physically (in-) active patients were. Conclusions: The presence of resting hyperinflation and occurrence of dynamic hyperinflation during ADL contribute to reduced physical activity levels in patients with COPD, independently of the degree of airflow limitation. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available