4.2 Article

Comparison of the Validity of Four Fall-Related Psychological Measures in a Community-Based Falls Risk Screening

Journal

RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT
Volume 82, Issue 3, Pages 545-554

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2011.10599787

Keywords

aging; falls prevention; measurement

Funding

  1. AAHPERD Research Consortium
  2. Louisiana State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examined the measurement properties of fall-related psychological instruments with a sample of 133 older adults (M age = 74.4 years, SD = 9.4). Measures included the Comprehensive Falls Risk Screening Instrument, Falls-efficacy Scale-International (PES-I), Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC), modified Survey of Activities and Fear of Falling in the Elderly (mSAFFE), Consequences of Falling (CoF), Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE), and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). The FES-I, ABC, mSAFFE, and CoF were significantly correlated with each other; with SF-36, and with mobility. The ABC and mSAFFE were significantly correlated with PASE. The ABC differentiated between Jailers and nonfallers and predicted total falls risk. Findings can. assist with the selection of psychological instruments in a falls risk screening context.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available