4.5 Article

Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Placenta Accreta After Institution of Team-Managed Care

Journal

REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 761-771

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1933719113512528

Keywords

peripartum hemorrhage; increta; percreta; transfusion; surgical management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Placenta accreta significantly contributes to maternal morbidity and mortality. We evaluated whether planned delivery and experienced, team-managed surgical intervention results in improved outcomes. We also examined whether risk factors differed for accreta, increta, and percreta and evaluated whether excess lower segment uterine vascularity correlates with disease severity. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients before versus after institution of a management protocol. Of the 58 044 deliveries over 10 years, there were 67 women whose pregnancies were histopathologically confirmed as placenta accreta, increta, or percreta (1/866). Clinical outcome measures were estimated blood loss (EBL), packed red blood cells (pRBCs) transfused, maternal and fetal complications, intensive care unit admission, and length of stay. Results: There were no maternal or infant deaths. In the managed cohort, EBL was reduced by 48% (P < .001), intraoperative pRBCs transfused by 40% (P < .01), total transfused pRBCs per case by 50% (P < .01), and surgical intensive care unit admissions by >50% (P < .01). Assessment of maternal risk factors by diagnosis revealed marked differences between accreta versus increta and percreta. Clinically assessed excess vascularity of the lower uterine segment correlated with disease severity. The incidence of neonatal complications was similar in both cohorts. Conclusions: Targeted delivery at 34 weeks and team-managed diagnosis, treatment, and care of patients with placenta accreta were associated with improved maternal, but not neonatal outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available