4.5 Review

Purification of Oogonial Stem Cells From Adult Mouse and Human Ovaries: An Assessment of the Literature and a View Toward the Future

Journal

REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 7-15

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1177/1933719112462632

Keywords

oogenesis; oocyte; ovary; germ cell; stem cell; human

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging [NIH R37-AG012279]
  2. Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award [NIH F32-AG034809]
  3. Glenn Foundation Award for Research in the Biological Mechanisms of Aging
  4. Henry and Vivian Rosenberg Philanthropic Fund
  5. Sea Breeze Foundation
  6. Vincent Memorial Hospital Research Funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Contemporary claims that mitotically active female germ line or oogonial stem cells (OSCs) exist and support oogenesis during postnatal life in mammals have been debated in the field of reproductive biology since March 2004, when a mouse study posed the first serious challenge to the dogma of a fixed pool of oocytes being endowed at birth in more than 50 years. Other studies have since been put forth that further question the validity of this dogma, including the isolation of OSCs from neonatal and adult mouse ovaries by 4 independent groups using multiple strategies. Two of these groups also reported that isolated mouse OSCs, once transplanted back into ovaries of adult female mice, differentiate into fully functional eggs that ovulate, fertilize, and produce healthy embryos and offspring. Arguably, one of the most significant advances in this emerging field was provided by a new research study published this year, which reported the successful isolation and functional characterization of OSCs from ovaries of reproductive age women. Two commentaries on this latest work, one cautiously supportive and one highly skeptical, were published soon afterward. This article evaluates the current literature regarding postnatal oogenesis in mammals and discusses important next steps for future work on OSC biology and function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available