4.5 Article

Computer-Assisted Oocyte Morphometry Before ICSI: Correlation of Oocyte Measurements With Fertilization and Embryo Development

Journal

REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 306-311

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1933719111420884

Keywords

oocyte; morphometry; ICSI; morphology; embryonic development

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)
  3. National Institute of Hormones and Womens's Health, Brazil

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study aimed to correlate morphometric parameters of the oocytes with the occurrence of fertilization following intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). In a prospective, controlled cohort design, women (n = 32) who were candidates for ICSI had oocytes (n = 258) collected and submitted to morphometric evaluation using the Cronus3 software program. The morphometric parameters obtained were oocyte diameter, perivitelline space width, zona pellucida thickness, and first polar body diameter. The median oocyte diameter was similar in cases in which fertilization occurred compared with those in which fertilization failed (75.2 and 75.9 mu m, respectively; P = .218). The 2 groups also had similar measurements of perivitelline space, zona pellucida, and first polar body. However, the best quality zygotes identified by a morphological score resulted from oocytes with larger diameter (75.6 vs 74.0 mu m; P < .01) and narrow perivitelline space (5.3 vs 7.1 mu m; P < .01). Embryo development, as assessed by cleavage at second day of culture, was not significantly associated with oocyte morphometric parameters. These findings suggest that morphometric parameters of the oocytes do not correlate with the occurrence of fertilization following ICSI but may assist in selecting oocytes more likely to originate high-quality zygotes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available