4.4 Article

Smooth Muscle Cells of the Bovine Cervical Stroma may have a Secretory, rather than a Contractile Function during Parturition

Journal

REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 303-311

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01070.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The bovine cervix contains a large amount of smooth muscle cells distributed over an outer muscular layer and within a stromal layer. The stromal layer exhibits no electromyographic (EMG) activity at parturition. This leads to the question whether the stromal smooth muscle cells of the bovine cervix are prepared to contract with parturition, or whether they have another function. To this end, cervical biopsies were repeatedly taken from 10 pregnant cows at day-185 and -275 of gestation, at spontaneous, uncomplicated calving and at 30 days after calving. The smooth muscle bundles of the stroma were immunohistochemically analysed (n = 5) with regard to their integrity and cellular density, and the degree of staining for connexin-43, smooth muscle actin alpha (SMA), desmin and vimentin. Additionally, the mRNA expression for connexin-43, SMA, desmin and vimentin was determined with RT-PCR (n = 5). The smooth muscle tissue was arranged in bundles, also at parturition. However, the cellular density of these bundles and the SMA mRNA expression were decreased at parturition. Additionally, the SMA staining and connexin-43 expression and staining remained constant during pregnancy and at parturition. This might indicate that stromal smooth muscle cells are not prepared to contract with parturition, in contrast to the myometrial smooth muscle cells. The smooth muscle cells, stained for SMA, also expressed vimentin, and the proportion of co-expression was increased at day-275 of pregnancy. This suggests that the stromal smooth muscle cells predominantly have a secretory function in cows.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available