4.5 Article

Cumulus gene expression as a predictor of human oocyte fertilisation, embryo development and competence to establish a pregnancy

Journal

REPRODUCTION
Volume 138, Issue 4, Pages 629-637

Publisher

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/REP-09-0144

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Chief Scientist's Office [CBZ/4/537]
  2. Medical Research Council [WBS U.1276.00.002.00001.01]
  3. MRC [G0300484, MC_U127684439] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [G0300484, G0700711B, MC_U127684439] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Chief Scientist Office [CZB/4/537] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The close relationship between cumulus cell function and oocyte developmental competence indicates that analysis of cumulus gene expression is a potential non-invasive method to aid embryo selection and lVF outcome. Cumulus was isolated from 674 oocytes from 75 women undergoing ICSI and gene expression analysed by quantitative RT-PCR. Cumulus expression of cyclooxygenase 2 (PTGS2) was higher with mature oocytes, whereas brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) was lower when fertilisation was normal. Expression levels of gremlin (GREM1) and BDNF were weak positive and negative predictors of embryo quality respectively. Ranking of GREM1 expression within cohorts of oocytes showed that oocytes associated with the highest GREM1 expression were more likely to be transferred or cryopreserved than discarded (49 vs 33%, P<0.02), although the clinical pregnancy rate was not significantly different. This study demonstrates both the feasibility and difficulties of this method of analysis in the largest such group studied thus far. Novel relationships between BDNF expression and fertilisation were identified, and the potential value of GREM1 expression as a marker of embryo quality supports the further assessment of GREM1 analysis in the context of embryo selection. Reproduction (2009) 138 629-637

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available