4.7 Article

Operational estimation of primary production at large geographical scales

Journal

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
Volume 112, Issue 8, Pages 3437-3448

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2007.11.018

Keywords

primary production; operational oceanography; ocean colour; remote sensing; marine phytoplankton

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [earth010003, pml010007] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. NERC [pml010007, earth010003] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A protocol is developed for calculation of phytoplankton production from remotely-sensed data in the operational mode. The key element is an objective assignment, on a pixel-by-pixel basis, of the parameters required to implement a primary production model (parameters of the photosynthesis-response function and of the vertical distribution of pigment biomass). In a regional context, the assignment is made by searching the archived data on these parameters according to the (remotely-sensed) chlorophyll concentration and surface temperature. We refer to this approach as the Nearest-Neighbour Method. The procedure is justified on the basis of the known variation of bio-optical properties of phytoplankton with chlorophyll and temperature as well as through consideration of the seasonal variation of watercolumn stratification and its effect on the vertical pigment profile. We illustrate the method, and its justification, using data from the Northwest Atlantic Ocean. Using data from an oceanographic expedition not included in the archive, we find that the parameters estimated in this way are not significantly different from those obtained by direct measurement. We estimate the error associated with parameter assignment on the calculated phytoplankton production to be about 27%. Some potential limitations of the method are discussed. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available