4.7 Article

Bayesian Belief Networks for predicting drinking water distribution system pipe breaks

Journal

RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
Volume 130, Issue -, Pages 1-11

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2014.04.024

Keywords

Bayesian Belief Networks; Drinking water distribution systems; Expert systems; Graphical models

Funding

  1. NSF [1031046]
  2. George Washington University School of Engineering and Applied Science
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1031046] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we use Bayesian Belief Networks (BBNs) to construct a knowledge model for pipe breaks in a water zone. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first attempt to model drinking water distribution system pipe breaks using BBNs. Development of expert systems such as BBNs for analyzing drinking water distribution system data is not only important for pipe break prediction, but is also a first step in preventing water loss and water quality deterioration through the application of machine learning techniques to facilitate data-based distribution system monitoring and asset management. Due to the difficulties in collecting, preparing, and managing drinking water distribution system data, most pipe break models can be classified as statistical-physical or hypothesis-generating. We develop the BBN with the hope of contributing to the hypothesis-generating class of models, while demonstrating the possibility that BBNs might also be used as statistical-physical models. Our model is learned from pipe breaks and covariate data from a mid-Atlantic United States (U.S.) drinking water distribution system network. BBN models are learned using a constraint-based method, a score-based method, and a hybrid method. Model evaluation is based on log-likelihood scoring. Sensitivity analysis using mutual information criterion is also reported. While our results indicate general agreement with prior results reported in pipe break modeling studies, they also suggest that it may be difficult to select among model alternatives. This model uncertainty may mean that more research is needed for understanding whether additional pipe break risk factors beyond age, break history, pipe material, and pipe diameter might be important for asset management planning. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available