4.4 Article

Characterisation and toxicological behaviour of Basic Methacrylate Copolymer for GRAS evaluation

Journal

REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages 32-43

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.05.012

Keywords

Basic Methacrylate Copolymer; Amino Methacrylate Copolymer; EUDRAGIT (R) E; Polymer toxicity; Safety; Food additive; Coating agent; NOAEL; GRAS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Basic Methacrylate Copolymer is a fully polymerised cationic copolymer with taste-masking and moisture protection properties. It is used as a pharmaceutical excipient and has potential use as a glazing/coating agent to solid food supplements. This article describes available information on the safety of the substance. Oral administration of radiolabelled copolymer to rats showed the major route of excretion to be via the faeces. Minor absorption may occur at <0.02%. Safety studies revealed no adverse toxicity following repeated administration at up to 2000 mg/kg/day in a sub-chronic study in the rat or 750 mg/kg/day in a sub-acute study in the dog. No reproductive toxicity occurred at up to 1000 mg/kg/day in the rat. The substance shows no evidence of genotoxicity, has low acute toxicity and no irritation or sensitisation potential. As per the FDA approach an ADI of 20 mg/kg bw can be concluded. Daily exposure from use as a food additive is estimated as up to 11.7 mg/kg bw in adults and 13.3 mg/kg bw in children. In view of the high molecular weight of the substance, its lack of absorption and its low toxicity profile, the ADI is deemed adequate. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
Article Medicine, Legal

New supporting data to guide the use of evident toxicity in acute oral toxicity studies (OECD TG 420)

Fiona Sewell, Ian Ragan, Graham Horgan, David Andrew, Thomas Holmes, Irene Manou, Boris P. Mueller, Tim Rowan, Barbara G. Schmitt, Marco Corvaro

Summary: There are currently three test guidelines for acute oral toxicity studies, but the subjectivity of one guideline may be hindering its wider use. In order to address this, the NC3Rs and EPAA collaborated to analyze historical data and provide recommendations on the recognition of 'evident toxicity'.

REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY (2024)

Article Medicine, Legal

The 2022 world health organization reevaluation of human and mammalian toxic equivalency factors for polychlorinated dioxins, dibenzofurans and biphenyls

Michael DeVito, Bas Bokkers, Majorie B. M. van Duursen, Karin van Ede, Mark Feeley, Elsa Antunes Fernandes Gaspar, Laurie Haws, Sean Kennedy, Richard E. Peterson, Ron Hoogenboom, Keiko Nohara, Kim Petersen, Cynthia Rider, Martin Rose, Stephen Safe, Dieter Schrenk, Matthew W. Wheeler, Daniele S. Wikoff, Bin Zhao, Martin van den Berg

Summary: In October 2022, the World Health Organization reevaluated the toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for chlorinated dioxin-like compounds in a panel convened in Lisbon. This effort utilized an updated database, Bayesian dose response modeling, and meta-analysis to derive Best-Estimate TEFs. Applying these new TEFs may result in lower total toxic equivalents for dioxin-like chemicals.

REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY (2024)